HoundShieldHoundShield
Products
Products by Industry

One firewall · every compliance framework · one deployment

TechnologySOC 2

Engineers pasting API keys & source into Copilot.

HealthcareHIPAA

Clinicians pasting PHI into AI for documentation.

DefenseCMMC L2

DoD contractors leaking CUI into proposal tools.

Legal & FinancePCI

Privileged client data shared with AI assistants.

Five EyesAUKUS

Allied suppliers navigating DISP & Essential 8.

GovernmentSoon

FedRAMP / FISMA — agency AI governance.

SOC 2 · HIPAA · CMMC L2 · 16 engines · <10msAll capabilities
Features
Core Capabilities

Inside the HoundShield firewall engine

AI Prompt Interception

Every LLM request inspected before it leaves the network.

16 Detection Engines

CUI, PII, IP, PHI, secrets, CAGE codes, clearances.

Immutable Audit Trail

SHA-256 tamper-evident logs. C3PAO-ready.

Live Threat Dashboard

Real-time blocked prompts, risk & posture.

Pricing
Pricing

All frameworks included in every plan

Free

Up to 1,000 prompts/mo

$0/mo
Pro

CMMC suite + AI gateway

$199/mo
Growth

PDF reports + C3PAO coord

$499/mo
Enterprise

On-prem · air-gapped

$999/mo
Compare all plans
Partners
Partner Program

Build & grow with HoundShield

RPO / MSP Referral

Co-brand the $499 report · keep the margin.

MSP / Agency

40% per report · 20% recurring · white-label.

Integrations

Drop-in proxy for ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude.

Docs
Documentation

Live in under 5 minutes · no code changes

Quickstart

One URL change → full compliance.

API Reference

Gateway, classifier & audit endpoints.

FAQ

Searchable answers — pricing, HIPAA, CUI.

16 engines · <10ms scan
Sign inStart free

NIST 800-171 Controls · Configuration Management

CM.2.003 — Track, Review, Approve, and Log Changes to Systems

CMMC Level 2SPRS if unmet: -3HIGH priority~6h to implement

Track, review, approve, and log changes to organizational systems.

What CM.2.003 means in plain English

Every significant change to your IT systems—installing new software, adding a user account, changing firewall rules, plugging in a new piece of equipment—should go through a simple approval process and be documented. This does not need to be a formal IT change management system with tickets; for an 8-person shop a shared change log in a spreadsheet works fine. The goal is that if something breaks, or if an assessor asks "why was this software installed?"—you have an answer. No undocumented shadow IT.

The assessment question

“Is there a documented change management process requiring approval before significant system changes are made, and is a change log maintained showing what was changed, when, by whom, and why?”

How to implement CM.2.003

  1. Create a Change Log spreadsheet with columns: Change ID, Date Requested, Requester, System Affected, Description of Change, Business Justification, Approver, Approval Date, Implementation Date, Implemented By, and Result/Notes.
  2. Define what constitutes a "significant change" requiring a log entry: installing or removing software, adding or removing user accounts, changing firewall or network settings, adding new hardware, applying major software updates (OS upgrades), and changing Group Policy.
  3. Establish a simple approval process: any change to a system handling CUI must be approved by the owner or designated IT manager before implementation. Document the approval in the Change Log (even if it is just an email reply, paste the email reference number).
  4. Configure Windows to help you track changes automatically: ensure Event ID 4688 (Process Creation) is logged so new software executions appear in audit logs. Enable Software Restriction Policy logging or AppLocker event log to capture software installation attempts.
  5. Review the change log monthly for completeness and accuracy. At the annual configuration review, verify that all changes in the log are reflected in the updated baseline configuration document.

Evidence your assessor will ask for

  • Change log spreadsheet showing recent entries with required fields (who, what, when, why, approval)
  • Written change management procedure defining what requires a change request and approval
  • Evidence of approvals (email excerpts, signatures, or digital approvals in the log)
  • At least one example of a rejected or deferred change showing the process was followed

Does AI prompt monitoring help with this control? Honestly, no.

CM.2.003 is met through the remediation steps above, not through AI traffic controls — an AI prompt firewall neither satisfies nor substitutes for it. We map AI monitoring only to the controls it genuinely evidences (flow control, boundary protection, audit, and incident support); for the full picture of where it does help, see the mapping guide linked below.

Full mapping: which 800-171 controls AI prompt monitoring evidences →

More Configuration Management controls

CM.2.001

Establish and Maintain Baseline Configurations

CM.2.002

Establish and Enforce Security Configuration Settings

CM.2.004

Analyze Security Impact of Changes Prior to Implementation

CM.2.005

Define and Enforce Access Restrictions for Configuration Changes

CM.2.006

Employ Principle of Least Functionality

CM.2.007

Restrict, Disable, or Prevent Use of Nonessential Programs

Score yourself against all 110 controls

The free ShieldReady assessment walks every NIST 800-171 requirement, computes your SPRS score, and shows exactly which gaps cost the most points.

Start the free assessment $499 AI risk assessment
HoundShieldHoundShield

Local-only AI compliance firewall for CMMC Level 2, HIPAA & SOC 2. Prompt content never leaves your network.

CMMC LVL 2HIPAASOC 2NIST 800-171DFARS 7012
Product
FeaturesHow it worksPricingCompareDashboardChangelog
Compliance
CMMC Level 2HIPAASOC 2NIST 800-171DFARS 7012
Company
PartnersDocumentationFAQContact salesAboutSecurity
© 2026 HoundShield. All rights reserved. · Privacy · Termshoundshield.com · local-only · zero data exfiltration